This article explores the poetics of silence and resistance in the works of Emily Dickinson and J.H. Prynne, arguing that silence functions not as mere absence but as a dynamic, subversive force. Drawing on affect theory, negative capability, and poststructuralist linguistics, the study examines how both poets employ silence to challenge dominant norms of language, authority, and meaning-making. Dickinson’s fragmented syntax and idiosyncratic punctuation embody a subtle resistance to patriarchal and theological constraints, while Prynne’s dense, opaque language interrogates the commodification of discourse and its ideological frameworks. The article positions silence as a transhistorical aesthetic strategy—an ethical and epistemological refusal of interpretive finality. By juxtaposing Dickinson’s nineteenth-century lyricism with Prynne’s experimental late-modernist poetics, the study reframes poetic obscurity as a form of resistance that transforms communicative practice and destabilizes cultural assimilation. In this light, silence is not inert but emerges as a productive space for inquiry, critical engagement, and transformative political possibility.
إسماعيل, محمد. (2025). What Remains Unsaid: The Poetics of Silence and Resistance in Emily Dickinson and J.H. Prynne. مجلة الدراسات الإنسانية والأدبية, 33(1), 605-625. doi: 10.21608/shak.2025.389300.1800
MLA
محمد إسماعيل. "What Remains Unsaid: The Poetics of Silence and Resistance in Emily Dickinson and J.H. Prynne", مجلة الدراسات الإنسانية والأدبية, 33, 1, 2025, 605-625. doi: 10.21608/shak.2025.389300.1800
HARVARD
إسماعيل, محمد. (2025). 'What Remains Unsaid: The Poetics of Silence and Resistance in Emily Dickinson and J.H. Prynne', مجلة الدراسات الإنسانية والأدبية, 33(1), pp. 605-625. doi: 10.21608/shak.2025.389300.1800
VANCOUVER
إسماعيل, محمد. What Remains Unsaid: The Poetics of Silence and Resistance in Emily Dickinson and J.H. Prynne. مجلة الدراسات الإنسانية والأدبية, 2025; 33(1): 605-625. doi: 10.21608/shak.2025.389300.1800