[1]- Liddell And Scott’s Greek –English Lexicon, S.V.νοῦς,p.535.
[1]- Cf. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles,(1973), 3 ed., Oxford University Press, p. 1417.
[1]- Diogenes Laertius, The Lives of The Most Eminent Philosophers,II, 6.
[1] -Ibid, II,6.
[1]- Plato, Philebus, 28c, 6-8 -30d. Cf. also, Laws, 967b5-6
[1]- Idem, Republic, 436b.
[1]- Idem, Timaeus, 37d5-6, 41b-e.
[1]- Idem, Phaedo, 97c,1-2.
[1]- Aristotle, Perὶ YucῆV,, III, 427a 19-24
[1]- Idem, Ἀnalutikὰ Prόtera, II, 19, 99b-100b.
[1]- Idem,Perὶ YucῆV, 429a19.
[1]- Ibid, 429a 10-11.
[1]- Ibid, 429a, 24-27.
[1]- Idem, peri genesewV kai foraV , B3, 738b 27ff.
[1]- Idem, Ἠqikὰ Nikomaceίa,, X, 7, 1177b, 1178a, Cf. Tὰ Mέta tὰ fusikά, 1070a24-26.
[1]- Idem, Perὶ YucῆV, III, 5, 430a 10-25.
[1]- Richard,A.Lee, Christopher,A.Long,( 2007 )“Nous and Logos in Aristotle”, Freiburger Zeitschrift fur Philosophie Und Theologie, Vol. 54,pp.348-367,p. 348.
[1]- Aristotle, , Ἀnalutikὰ Prόtera II,19, 99, b18.
[1]- Ibid, 100b, 5-14.
[1]- Cf.Idem, Ἠqikὰ Nikomaceίa, 1142a 23-27.
[1]- Idem, Tὰ Mέta tὰ fusikά , 1047b34
[1]- Idem, Perὶ YucῆV,430a,10-14.
[1]- Theiler, W., (1979) Aristoteles: Über die Seele. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, p.142.
[1] - Aristotle, Perὶ YucῆV, 430a,10-25.
* جديرٌ بالذکر أن أرسطو قد أشار إلى العقل الفعال أيضاً بمصطلح to poiuon أما عبارة poihtikόV noῦV فلقد وجدت أولاً عند الإسکندر الأفروديسى .
[1]- Aristotle,Ἠqikὰ Nikomaceίa,. VI 3, 1139 b 14-16.
[1]- Idem, Perὶ YucῆV, 430a 10-14.
[1]- Aristotle,Peri yuchV, III, 5, 430a 17-18.
[1]- Ibid, 430a 23-24.
[1]- Ibid, III, 5,430 a24-25.
[1]- Ibid, 430a 25.
[1]- Kaminska, S., (2017), “Rational Vs. Mystical Readings Of Aristotle’s Nous Poietiokos introduction to the Subject and Overview of Central Positions” , Analiza i Egzystencja, Vol.39, p.22, pp.19-35.
[1]- Aristotle,Tὰ Mέta tὰ fusikά, L,3,1070a7,9-10
[1]- Cohoe, C.M., (2014) “Nous in Aristotle’s De Anima”, Philosophy Compass 9/9, p.598, pp. 594–604.
[1]-Cf. Aristotle ,Tὰ Mέta tὰ fusikά , 1073a47.
[1]-.Olson,R.M, (2013),“Aristotle on God: Divine Nous as Unmoved Mover”, Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, P.106,PP.101-109.
[1] - Aristotle, Perὶ zῴwn genέsewV, 2.3, Cf. also, Tὰ Mέta tὰ fusikά, 12.9.
[1] - Idem, peri yuchV, 3.6,430a 26.
[1] - Cohoe, C.M., (2014) “Nous in Aristotle’s De Anima”, p.600,Cf.peri yuchV, 430a5-9.
[1]- Ibid , p.600.
[1]- Cf. Aristotle,peri yuchV,430 a5.
[1] - Ibid, 430a 16-18, Cf. Idem,Ta Fusika, III,5.
[1]- Ibid, 430a 17.
[1]- Liddell And Scott’s Greek English Lexicon, S.V. paqhtikoV, p.583-612.
[1]- Aristotle,peri yuchV,429 a 18..
[1]- Ibid, 429 a 16.
[1]- Ibid, 429 a23.
[1]- Ibid, 429a21.
[1]- Idem,Ta Fusika, III, 3.
[1]- Idem, peri yuchV, 431a3, Cf. Tὰ Mέta tὰ fusikά, Θ.8.
[1]- Idem, peri yuchV, 429a13-29.
[1]- Ibid, , 430a 10-25
[1]- Ibid, 429a10 - 430a, 10.
[1]- Gerd,V.R., (2010), Ancient Prespectives on Aristotle’s de Anima, Leuven University Press, p.174.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Intellectu, A,106.19 – 110.3
[1]- Ibid, B, 110.4 – 112.5
[1]- Ibid, C1,112.5 -113.12
[1]- Hesamifar,A.,& Baqershahi,A.N.,” Intellect in Alexander of Aphrodisias and Its Impact Upon Muslim Philosophers”, Athens Journal of Humanities and Arts, Vol. X, No. Y, P.4,PP.1-22.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Intellectu,, 110.22-4, 111.27-36.
[1]- Ibid, 112.9-11, 27-28.
[1]- Ibid, 112.11-18.
[1]- Ibid,112.18 – 20.
[1]- Ibid, 112.23-5, 30.
[1]- Idem, De Anima, 84, 20-21, Cf. also, Tuominen,M., (2006), “Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Active Intellect”, Mind and Modality, P.64,PP.56-70.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 81,22-25.
[1]- الإسکندر الأفروديسى : (1971) مقالة في العقل على رأى أرسطو ، ترجمة إسحق بن حنين، تحقيق وتقديم : د. عبد الرحمن بدوى ، دار المشرق ، بيروت، ص 31،32.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 2,4-6.
[1]- Aristotle, peri yuchV,, III, 4, 429a 13-17.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 84, 24-25.
[1]- Ibid, 87,29, Cf, Aristotle, peri yuchV,, III, 4, 430a 6-7.
[1]- Ibid, 84, 19-20.
[1]- Aristotle,peri yuchV, 3.4.429b30–430a10
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 84,24- 85,5.
[1]- Aristotle, peri yuchV,,429a27–28
[1]- Hendrix, J.S., (2010),Philosophy of Intellect and Vision in the De anima and De Intellectu of Alexander of Aphrodisias,P.16.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima ,106
[1]- Idem, De Intellectu, 110.
[1]- Idem, De Anima, 86,14-18
[1]- Hendrix, J.S., (2010),Philosophy of Intellect and Vision in the De anima and De Intellectu of Alexander of Aphrodisias,P.13.
[1]- Hesamifar,A.,& Baqershahi,A.N.,” Intellect in Alexander of Aphrodisias and Its Impact Upon Muslim Philosophers”,p.11
[1] - Alexander Aphrodisias , De Anima ,89,9-19, Cf. Caston, V. ,(1999), "Aristotle's Two Intellects: A Modest Proposal". Phronesis 4413: PP.199-227, & Laks, A.,(2000), "Metaphysics 7". Frede, M. and Charles, D. (eds.), Aristotle's Metaphysics Lambda. Oxford: Oxford University Press, PP.207-43. Cf. Also Aristotle, peri yuchV,, 430a18.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 88, 23-24.
[1]- Idem, De Intellectu, 107.
[1] -Tuominen,M., (2006), “Aristotle and Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Active Intellect”,P.66.
[1] - الإسکندر الأفروديسى ،(1971)، مقالة في العقل على رأى أرسطوطاليس،ص41، ترجمة إسحق بن حنين، تحقيق وتقديم : د.عبد الرحمن بدوى، دار المشرق، بيروت.
[1]- Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 88,24-89,9-11 .
[1]- Kaminska, S., (2017), “Rational Vs. Mystical Readings Of Aristotle’s Nous Poietiokos introduction to the Subject and Overview of Central Positions”, p.26.
[1]- Cf. Aristotle, peri yuchV,, 3.5, 430a12.
[1]- Tim C.,(2000), History of the Mind-Body Problem, London: Routledge,p.39-40.
[1]- Schroeder,F.M.,(1981), "The Analogy of the Active Intellect to Light in the 'De Anima', Hermes, 109. Bd., H. 2 p.215.,PP.215-225, Cf. Also, Aristotle, peri yuchV,430 a,14-17,راجع أيضاً الأفروديسى، مقالة في العقل، 33
[1] - Alexander Aphrodisias, De anima, 89, 1-2., De Intellectu, 107.
[1]- Idem, De Intellectu, 107.
[1]- Hesamifar,A.,& Baqershahi,A.N.,” Intellect in Alexander of Aphrodisias and Its Impact Upon Muslim Philosophers”,p.10-11.
[1]- Cf. Risalah fil-aql (A Treatise on the intellect) or Risalah fi mahyyat al-aql (A Treatise on the Nature of the Intellect) written by al-Kindi and Fi maani al-aql (On the Meanings of the Intellect) written by Al-Farabi.
[1]- Fouad El-Ehwany,A., “AL-Kindi”, History of Muslim Philosophers,Vol.I, Book,3,Ch.21,p.432,pp.421-434.
[1] - Corbin, H., (1993). History of Islamic philosophy. Kegan Paul International. p. 155.
-[1] أبو ريدة، محمد عبد الهادى (1950)، رسائل الکندى الفلسفية لأبى يوسف يعقوب بن إسحق الکندى، ص13.
[1]- Adamson, P., (2005). "Al-Kindī and the reception of Greek philosophy". In Adamson, Peter; Taylor, Richard C. (eds.). p.36.
[1]- Jolivet, J., 1971, L’Intellect selon Kindi, Leiden: Brill , p.158-160.
[1]- El-Ehwany,,A., “AL-Kindi”, History of Muslim Philosophers,p.432
-[1]أبو ريدة، محمد عبد الهادى (1950)، رسائل الکندى الفلسفية لأبى يوسف يعقوب بن إسحق الکندى ، ص 97.
[1] - نفس المرجع ، ص 113.
[1]- Adamson, Peter (2005). "Al-Kindī and the reception of Greek philosophy". In Adamson, Peter; Taylor, Richard C. (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Arabic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 40-41.
[1]- Ibid, p.40.
[1]- أبو ريدة، محمد عبد الهادى (1950)،رسائل الکندى الفلسفية لأبى يوسف يعقوب بن إسحق الکندى ،ص 357- 356.
[1] - نفس المرجع ، ص 313.
.Cf. Richard J.M.,(1964), “Al-Kindi’s Treatise On The Intellect: Text and Tentative Translation”, Islamic Studies, Vol.3,No.2, p.129, pp.119-149.
[1]- Al-Kindi, Rasail al-Kindi al-falsafiyyah (The Philosophical Treatises of al-Kindi), ed. Mohammad Abdolhadi Abou Raydeh (Cairo: Dar al-Fekr al-Arabi, 1950), 353-354, & Cf. El-Ehwany,(1951), Islamic Philosophy, Cairo, p. 51-52.
[1]- Richard J.M., “Al-Kindi’s Treatise On The Intellect: Text and Tentative Translation”,p.135.
[1]- أبو ريدة، محمد عبد الهادى (1950)،رسائل الکندى الفلسفية لأبى يوسف يعقوب بن إسحق الکندى ، ص155 .
[1] - نفس المرجع، ص358 .
[1]- Richard J.M., “Al-Kindi’s Treatise On The Intellect: Text and Tentative Translation”,p.130.
(* )Ibid, p.141, “quartus uero est intellectus apparens ex anima , qui, cum propalaueris eum, erit in effectu in alio a te”.
[1]- Cf. Alexander Aphrodisias, De Anima, 89,9-19 , Cf Also,Al-Kindi, Rasail al-Kindi al-falsafiyyah (The Philosophical Treatises of al-Kindi), al-Kindi’s teatise on the true, primary ,and perfect agent, I, 182-84. Cf. also Herbert A. D., Alfarabi, Avicenna, & Averroes, on Intellect (1992), New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 20–24.
[1]- Cf. Davoudi, Aql dar hikmat mashsha az Arastu ta Ibn Sina, 225-231.
[1]- أبو ريدة، محمد عبد الهادى (1950)،رسائل الکندى الفلسفية لأبى يوسف يعقوب بن إسحق الکندى ، ص350.
)
مشاهدة على SCiNiTO